Abstract
水合肼-氢还原重量法测定硫酸钯溶液产品中的钯含量
Determination of Palladium in PdSO4 Solution by Hydrazine Hydrate-Hydrogen Reduction Gravimetric Method
Received:June 21, 2018  
DOI:
中文关键词: 分析化学  水合肼-氢还原重量法  硫酸钯  
英文关键词: analytical chemistry  hydrazine hydrate-hydrogen reduction gravimetric method  palladium(II) sulfate  palladium
基金项目:
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
SU Linlin State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies for Comprehensive Utilization of Platinum Metals,Sino-Platinum Metals Co. Ltd., Kunming 650106, China sulin@ipm.com.cn 
ZUO Chuan State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies for Comprehensive Utilization of Platinum Metals,Sino-Platinum Metals Co. Ltd., Kunming 650106, China zuochuan@ipm.com.cn 
HAN Yuan State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies for Comprehensive Utilization of Platinum Metals,Sino-Platinum Metals Co. Ltd., Kunming 650106, China  
LUO Yuan State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies for Comprehensive Utilization of Platinum Metals,Sino-Platinum Metals Co. Ltd., Kunming 650106, China  
LIU Jun State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies for Comprehensive Utilization of Platinum Metals,Sino-Platinum Metals Co. Ltd., Kunming 650106, China  
ZHAO Fei State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies for Comprehensive Utilization of Platinum Metals,Sino-Platinum Metals Co. Ltd., Kunming 650106, China  
XIONG Jun State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies for Comprehensive Utilization of Platinum Metals,Sino-Platinum Metals Co. Ltd., Kunming 650106, China  
Hits: 2017
Download times: 1774
中文摘要:
      采用水合肼作还原剂,还原后的金属钯黑再通氢还原纯化,建立了水合肼-氢还原重量法测硫酸钯溶液中的钯含量。在优化后的测定条件下,测定了4.00%~14.50%含量的钯,分析结果的极差、相对标准偏差(RSDn=6)分别为0.02%、0.062%~0.16%。与GB/T 23276-2009法相比较,测定结果的准确度和精密度更高。
英文摘要:
      Content Using hydrazine hydrate as reducing agent, the reduced palladium black was purified by hydrogen reduction, the determination of palladium in PdSO4 solution by hydrazine hydrate and hydrogen reduction gravimetric method was established. Under the optimized conditions, the palladium content of 4.00%~14.50% was determined. The results showed that the ranges and the relative standard deviations (RSD, n=6) was 0.02%、0.062%~0.16%, respectively. Compared with GB/T 23276-2009 method, the accuracy and precision of this method are higher.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close